Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
As Chief Constable, I'm proud of our progress in building a workforce that reflects our communities. Between April 2023 and March 2024, we employed 1,392 women police officers and 1,607 women police staff. While there was a slight decrease in women at the Chief Inspector and Superintendent levels, appointments like Rachel Nolan as Deputy Chief Constable show ongoing commitment to gender balance in senior roles.
In police staff positions, women's representation remained stable, with a notable increase in senior staff grades. Our gender pay gap reduced by over three percent since last year, though challenges persist due to service length differences and grade distributions.
We continue to prioritise recruitment, retention, and career progression through targeted initiatives, striving for a fully representative and inclusive workforce at Essex Police.
The below table shows the gender breakdown (headcount and percentage of the total workforce) by gender and employee group for those included in the gender pay gap analysis as at 31st March 2025. The table includes information for Essex officers and for staff.
| Gender | Officers | Staff | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 2307 | 754 | 3061 |
| Female | 1417 | 1590 | 3007 |
| Total | 3724 | 2344 | 6068 |
| Male % | 61.95% | 32.17% | 50.44% |
| Female % | 38.05% | 67.83% | 49.56% |
The table demonstrates that there are 1417 female officers, which equates to 38.05% of the total officer headcount. This is an increase when compared to the position as at 31st March 2024 (1392 / 36.97%). For staff, the proportion of females continues to be much higher at 67.83% (1590 out of 2344) which represents an increase (as a proportion) when compared to 31st March 2024 (67.21% / 1607).
The following table shows the rank breakdown by gender for officers as at 31st March 2025 by headcount and percentage. The table also includes the previous reports female % as at 31st March 2024.
| Rank | Male | Female | Total | Male % | Female % | Previous Report Female % | Change to Last Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Officer | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.00% | 40.00% | 16.67% | 23.33% |
| Chief Superintendent | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.33% | 16.67% | 23.08% | -6.41% |
| Superintendent | 17 | 5 | 22 | 77.27% | 22.73% | 20.00% | 2.73% |
| Chief Inspector | 37 | 12 | 49 | 75.51% | 24.49% | 22.64% | 1.85% |
| Inspector | 109 | 52 | 161 | 67.70% | 32.30% | 31.79% | 0.51% |
| Sergeant | 380 | 165 | 545 | 69.72% | 30.28% | 28.60% | 1.67% |
| Constable | 1751 | 1179 | 2930 | 59.76% | 40.24% | 39.09% | 1.15% |
| Grand Total | 2307 | 1417 | 3724 | 61.95% | 38.05% | 36.97% | 1.08% |
The table demonstrates there have been increases in the proportion of all ranks with the exception of Chief Superintendent (which has reduced from 23.08% to 16.67%. The most notable increases are in Chief Officers (from 16.67% to 40.00%) and Superintendent (from 20.00% to 22.73%). With regards to Senior Leadership roles, there are a total of 88 Chief Inspectors and above, of which, 21 are female (23.86%). This is a marginal increase when compared to 31st March 2024 (20.00%) when measured as a proportion, but the headcount has remained the same (albeit with different headcounts across individual ranks).
The following table shows the rank breakdown by gender for staff as at 31st March 2025 by headcount and percentage and the position when compared to the previous year. All Essex Staff roles are set against a specific grade as set out below.
| Grade Range | Male | Female | Total | Male % | Female % | Previous Report Female % | Change to Last Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Staff (SPS 1 & Above) | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.88% | 53.13% | 53.13% | 0.00% |
| PO 6 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.43% | 28.57% | 25.00% | 3.57% |
| PO 5 | 13 | 17 | 30 | 43.33% | 56.67% | 53.33% | 3.33% |
| PO 4 | 17 | 30 | 47 | 36.17% | 63.83% | 64.29% | -0.46% |
| PO 3 | 33 | 25 | 58 | 56.90% | 43.10% | 39.66% | 3.45% |
| PO 2 | 45 | 37 | 82 | 54.88% | 45.12% | 45.68% | -0.56% |
| PO 1 | 50 | 52 | 102 | 49.02% | 50.98% | 47.27% | 3.71% |
| SO 2 | 75 | 113 | 188 | 39.89% | 60.11% | 59.85% | 0.25% |
| SO 1 | 73 | 115 | 188 | 38.83% | 61.17% | 59.36% | 1.81% |
| SCALE 6 | 84 | 150 | 234 | 35.90% | 64.10% | 65.75% | -1.65% |
| SCALE 5 | 72 | 272 | 344 | 20.93% | 79.07% | 76.14% | 2.93% |
| SCALE 4 | 184 | 520 | 704 | 26.14% | 73.86% | 72.85% | 1.02% |
| SCALE 3 | 49 | 167 | 216 | 22.69% | 77.31% | 80.39% | -3.08% |
| SCALE 2 | 3 | 14 | 17 | 17.65% | 82.35% | 62.96% | 19.39% |
| PCSO | 36 | 59 | 95 | 37.89% | 62.11% | 63.11% | -1.00% |
| Grand Total | 754 | 1590 | 2344 | 32.17% | 67.83% | 67.21% | 0.62% |
The report demonstrates that the proportion of female senior staff has remained at 53.13%. There have been fluctuations across all the other grades, the most notable reduction in scale 3 (-3.08%) and scale 6 (-1.65%) albeit there continues to be a higher proportion of females overall in those grades. The most notable increases are in scale 2 (+19.39%) and in P01 (+3.71%), P06 (+3.57%) and P03 (+3.45%). Of all the grades, only 4 (P06, P03, P02 and P01) have a lower proportion of female staff compared to males.
The following section details the differences in pay between males and females and the resulting pay gap shown as a mean and median average.
The combined mean and median figures outlined below encompass both officers and staff, who are distinct groups. Their pay, grading/rank structures, and gender compositions vary. Officers follow national pay scales, which are generally higher than the average salaries for staff. A higher proportion of staff are female than is the case for officers. In addition, in both cases, pay rates rise incrementally. As a general rule individuals within a specific rank or grade with a longer length of service will be paid at a higher rate.
For officers, there is pay gap primarily because there is a higher overall average length of service for males compared to females across the majority of the ranks, meaning a lower number of females have remained in force to progress to higher scale points compared to males. For example, as at 31st March 2025, a total of 40.20% of females were at the highest police constable scale point compared to 48.83% males. As a result, this means that we have a higher number of male officers on higher scale points compared to females. This rank represents the largest proportion of our officers and thus has a greater proportionate impact on the pay gap. In addition, the recent success in female recruitment will lead to a higher proportion of female officers at the lower pay scales within this group.
With regards to staff, the gap exists primarily due to the fact that we have a much higher proportion of females in lower graded roles (74.81% in scales 2-4) compared to males (25.19%). Higher numbers of our staff work in roles within these grades, thus higher impact on the pay gap.
The table below shows the differences in pay for the genders when the pay points are grouped into quartiles. The quartiles for officers and staff vary, however as a general approximation the lower quartile contains hourly pay rates of between £10.76-£17.12 per hour (ph), lower middle £17.13-£20.97 ph, upper middle £20.98-£24.96 ph and upper £24.97 and above. The figures in grey represent 2024 values.
| Officers | Staff | Combined Officers and Staff | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartile | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female |
| Upper Quartile | 71.75% | 28.25% | 42.83% | 57.17% | 68.65% | 31.35% |
| 72.72% | 27.28% | 48.83% | 51.17% | 69.01% | 30.99% | |
| Upper Middle Quartile | 65.95% | 34.05% | 34.34% | 65.66% | 57.55% | 42.45% |
| 64.29% | 35.71% | 33.11% | 66.89% | 54.52% | 45.48% | |
| Lower Middle Quartile | 60.36% | 39.64% | 24.46% | 75.54% | 45.68% | 54.32% |
| 58.99% | 41.01% | 31.64% | 68.36% | 45.68% | 54.32% | |
| Lower Quartile | 54.73% | 45.27% | 24.75% | 75.25% | 35.93% | 64.07% |
| 53.50% | 46.50% | 22.81% | 77.19% | 35.93% | 64.07% | |
The table indicates a pay gap in favour of males. When focusing on the combined position, the data demonstrates that the force has more males in senior positions than females and that in comparison to last year’s figures, the percentage of females represented in the upper middle, lower middle and lower quartiles has reduced. However, there has been an increase in the percentage of females represented in the upper quartile.
For officers only, there has been a reduction in the percentage of females represented in the upper middle and lower middle quartiles but an increase in upper and lower middle quartiles.
For staff there has been a reduction in the upper middle quartile and an increase in the upper quartile (with the other quartiles remaining the same).
The following table shows the mean and median of all bonuses paid during the 2024/25 financial year. The bonuses paid include firearms payments, detective payments, unpleasant scene payments and honorarium payments awarded by a central remuneration panel who review submissions against relevant criteria.
| Gender | Number of recipients | % receiving bonus payment | Mean Payment | Mean Bonus Pay Gap | Median Payment | Median Bonus Pay Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 715 | 23.36% | £852.93 | £500.00 | ||
| Female | 490 | 16.30% | £862.35 | -1.10% | £1,200.00 | -140.00% |
Of note, for officers, the majority of bonus payments made relate to either a Detective or Firearms Payments.
The aim of this plan is to reduce and ultimately eliminate unjustified pay gaps by implementing targeted, evidence-based interventions that promote equity, inclusion, and progression.
Key Issues Identified:
|
GPG |
Actions |
Timeline |
Owner |
Success Measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Career Progression Support |
|
By Q2 2026/27 |
Positive Action Team and HR People Development Lead |
Increased female participation in development programmes and promotions. |
|
Retention Strategy |
|
By Q4 2025/26 |
HR Organisational Management and SLT Leads |
Improved retention rates and reduced gender disparity in service length. |
|
Recruitment Monitoring |
|
By Q1 2026/27 |
Corporate Recruitment Team and Positive Action Team |
Balanced gender representation in new hires and across ranks. |
|
Leadership Representation |
|
Ongoing |
Positive Action Team |
Increased female representation in senior leadership roles. |
|
Bonus Equity |
|
Review by Q4 2025/26; annual monitoring |
Remuneration Panel |
Equitable bonus distribution across genders. |
|
Data Monitoring & Reporting |
· Publish Annual Pay Gap |
Annual reporting dashboard by Q1 2026/27 |
HR Employee Relations |
Transparent reporting and data-driven decision making. |
|
Policy Review
|
· Introduce regular quarterly review of bonus payments. |
First review by Q1 2026/27; annually thereafter |
HR Strategy |
Policies reflect inclusive and equitable practices. |
|
Training & Awareness |
· Deliver training on unconscious bias, inclusive leadership, and equitable decision-making. |
Already delivered |
Head of Learning and Development |
Improved awareness and inclusive behaviours among managers. |
|
Employee Engagement |
· Host listening to sessions and feedback forums to inform future actions. |
Engagement activities ongoing from Q4 2025/26 |
Positive Action Team, Human Resources People Development Lead and Staff Support Networks |
High employee participation and actionable feedback. |